Barry Lynn Speaks to Bay Area ACLU Chapter By Kevin Schultz A number of AU-Sacramento members made a day-trip to Berkeley to hear one of the nation's most articulate and vocal supporters of church-state separation on November 24. Rev. Barry Lynn, Executive Director for Americans United For Separation of Church & State, has an amazing ability to garner media attention. After meeting him and hearing him speak personally, I can understand why. As we entered the North Berkeley Senior Center, Rev. Lynn stood relaxed near the front desk, exchanging small talk with some of the local ACLU Berkeley/Albany/Richmond/Kensington (BARK) area members. A number of us from the Sacramento area introduced ourselves, and Rev. Lynn responded warmly, demonstrating approachability coupled with a genuine willingness to get to know people. A standing room only crowd of about 200 attended Rev. Lynn's 45-minute talk, entitled "Politics, Patriotism, and Religion: Dangerous Mixtures Ahead." Lynn discussed several major victories which stopped -- at least temporarily -- the further integration of church and state. He first mentioned the strong bipartisan rejection (239-178) of Rep. Walter B. Jones' "Houses of Worship Political Speech Protection Act" (H.R. 2357). He also mentioned the failure of the "Charity, Aid, Recovery and Empowerment Act" (S. 1924) (a.k.a. Bush's "faith-based" initiative). Lynn stated that while legislators may re-introduce these bills in the next session, he believes that the education which went into their defeat will help stunt similar legislation in the future. He believes that the integration of religion and politics produces hypocrites, and joked that the most dangerous place to be after the Ninth Circuit decision was between a politician and a television camera. He related a personal story in which he had asked a member of Congress during a televised panel discussion why they (or anyone else, for that matter) had failed to attend the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance the day before the Ninth Circuit pledge decision. The member of Congress told Rev. Lynn that they thought such a question was "outrageous." Another notable hypocrite Rev. Lynn mentioned was Pat Robertson, who at one-time sharply criticized faith-based funding. In October, Mr. Robertson accepted a $500,000 grant for his "Operation Blessing" program. Lynn stated, "Robertson was one of the earliest critics of the "faith-based" scheme, but I guess 30 pieces of silver was enough to change his mind." He mentioned some disappointments, including President Bush's comment (in response to the Ninth Circuit decision) "I believe that it points up the fact that we need common sense judges who understand that our rights were derived from God. Those are the kind of judges I intend to put on the bench." Rev. Lynn believes the Democratic party should have tossed out all of the White House nominations after such un-Constitutional arrogance. He also mentioned his disappointment that appellate court nominee McConnell passed the Senate Judiciary Committee, even though he publicly states he wishes to immediately pass two new Constitutional amendments! Rev. Lynn ended by commenting that the what the Religious Right wants most is for people like us to just give up, because then they could then get everything they want. An active question and answer session followed the talk.